Medical marijuana: What does science say?
A look at the pros and cons of medical marijuana use, a topic that inspires strong opinions on both sides.
By Jill U. Adams Special to The Times
August 18, 2008
DEPENDING ON whom you ask, marijuana is a dangerous drug that should be kept
illegal alongside heroin and PCP, or it's a miracle herb with a trove of medical
benefits that the government is seeking to deny the public -- or something in
between: a plant with medical uses and drawbacks, worth exploring.
As the political debates over medical marijuana drag on, a small cadre of
researchers continues to test inhaled marijuana for the treatment of pain,
nausea and muscle spasms.
All drugs have risks, they point out -- including ones in most Americans'
medicine cabinets, such as aspirin and other pain-relievers or antihistamines
such as Benadryl. Doctors try to balance those risks against the potential for
medical good -- why not for marijuana as well, they ask.
The truth, these researchers say, is that marijuana has medical benefits -- for
chronic-pain syndromes, cancer pain, multiple sclerosis, AIDS wasting syndrome
and the nausea that accompanies chemotherapy -- and attempts to understand and
harness these are being hampered. Also, they add, science reveals that the risks
of marijuana use, which have been thoroughly researched, are real but generally
small.
Dr. Donald Abrams, chief of hematology and oncology at San Francisco General
Hospital and professor of clinical medicine at UC San Francisco, says he sees
cancer patients in pain, not eating or sleeping well, experiencing nausea and
vomiting from treatment, and being depressed about their situation. He says he
is glad that he lives in California, where use of medical marijuana is allowed
by state law, although federal officials continue to raid cannabis dispensaries
in the state and scrutinize practices of physicians who specialize in writing
cannabis recommendations for patients.
"I can talk to patients about medicinal cannabis [and] I'm often
recommending it to them for these indications," Abrams says.
Pro: Marijuana use for chronic pain and nausea
Smoked marijuana can bring relief to sufferers
of neuropathic pain comparable to that of other painkiller drugs, some studies
show.
Medical marijuana use has a history stretching back thousands of years. In
prebiblical times, the plant was used as medicinal tea in China, a stress
antidote in India and a pain- reliever for earaches, childbirth and more
throughout Asia, the Middle East and Africa.
In recent decades, medical researchers have investigated marijuana's effects on
various kinds of pain -- from damaged nerves in people with HIV, diabetes and
spinal cord injury; from cancer; and from multiple sclerosis. Marijuana has also
been hypothesized to help with nausea induced by chemotherapy and antiretroviral
therapy, and with severe loss of appetite as seen in people with the AIDS
wasting syndrome.
The weed's actions are due to the active ingredients tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
and some 60 other cannabinoids, which mimic the action of chemicals -- known as
endogenous cannabinoids -- that exist naturally in the brain. Those cannabinoids
activate receptors in our nerves, triggering physiological responses.
A legal prescription form of THC (Marinol) exists, yet researchers say it's far
from a perfect drug. Taken orally, its absorption is highly variable and
unpredictable and often delayed, says Dr. Igor Grant, a UC San Diego
psychiatrist who directs the university's Center for Medicinal Cannabis
Research. "Smoking is a very efficient way to deliver THC," he says.
As a result of its federally illegal status, medicinal use of marijuana is
restricted to carefully vetted clinical research studies or to patients in
states such as California that have passed laws to allow for personal medical
use. Research on the medicinal use of marijuana relies on government-issued
marijuana cigarettes, which come in different strengths and are supplied by the
National Institute on Drug Abuse.
The UC Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research in San Diego helps coordinate
clinical studies to investigate the safety and effectiveness of marijuana.
Here's what they've found.
Neuropathic pain
Recent research suggests that marijuana can assuage this chronic-pain syndrome
in which burning sensations occur and simple touch can feel like hurt. It is
unaffected by aspirin-like drugs and fairly resistant to stronger analgesics
such as opiates.
In a 2007 study on neuropathic pain related to HIV infection, 50 patients smoked
marijuana cigarettes three times a day or marijuana cigarettes from which active
ingredients had been extracted. Subjects then rated their pain on a scale
ranging from "no pain" to "worst pain imaginable." The
results, published in the journal Neurology, showed a 34% reduction in ratings
of pain in the marijuana group compared with 17% in the placebo group over five
days of treatment.
Another study in 44 patients reported in June in the Journal of Pain found that
marijuana alleviated neuropathic pain arising from a variety of conditions,
including spinal-cord injury and diabetes. Participants smoked marijuana on a
set schedule -- first two puffs, then three puffs an hour later, then four puffs
an hour after that -- from a single cigarette containing either 0%, 3.5%, or 7%
THC. Average pain ratings before smoking were 55 on a 100-point scale and
decreased by 46% in both treatment groups and by 27% in the placebo group one
hour after the last puff.
Analgesic drugs are often tested against experimentally induced pain. Such
studies have been conducted for marijuana too. In one 2007 report in the journal
Anesthesiology, 15 healthy volunteers received skin injections with capsaicin --
the chemical behind that fiery spice in chile peppers -- and then smoked
different-strength marijuana cigarettes. The medium dose, with a 4% THC
concentration, lessened the burning pain.
These three pain studies all concluded that smoked marijuana can bring relief to
sufferers of neuropathic pain comparable to other analgesic drugs. It is not a
cure, Grant says: "It's like other pain medicines, you have to keep taking
it."
Study subjects did feel high, an effect that varied among individuals. Marijuana
also affected thinking, shown as problems with tasks of memory and complicated
reasoning after the strongest marijuana cigarettes were used. Potentially
problematic, these effects were tolerated by subjects -- no one opted out of the
study because they couldn't think straight.
Grant says it's important to have a choice of treatments because not everyone
responds to or can tolerate the available drugs. Antidepressants are used for
neuropathic pain but cause dry mouth, constipation and urinary problems, and
must be avoided by people with conditions such as glaucoma. Others can't take
aspirin-like drugs. "Having an alternative compound is always good,"
Grant says.
Multiple sclerosis
Patients with multiple sclerosis suffer muscle spasms, pain and tremor.
Anecdotal reports suggest that marijuana may be helpful, but controlled studies
are few. One, presented at an April meeting, had 51 multiple sclerosis patients
smoke 0% or 4% THC marijuana cigarettes daily for three days. Intensity of
spasms was reduced by 32% and pain ratings by 50% after smoking marijuana,
compared with 2% and 22% reductions after placebo cigarettes. Five subjects
withdrew, citing side effects: feeling too high, dizzy or fatigued.
Other studies in patients with multiple sclerosis used a cannabis extract that
can be taken orally. In a 2007 European Journal of Neurology study, nearly half
of 184 patients experienced at least 30% improvement in muscle spasms.
But a 2004 Neurology paper showed no reduction in objective measures of arm
tremor with cannabis extract, although five subjects out of 13 reported feeling
improvement. This might have resulted from mood-altering effects of the drug or
from some aspect of tremor not measured.
Nausea
A 2008 review published in the European Journal of Cancer Care analyzed 30
clinical studies using cannabinoid drugs synthesized in the lab and concluded
that they were better than standard antinausea drugs in alleviating the nausea
and vomiting that accompanies chemotherapy. One such drug is Marinol, a THC
preparation approved by the Food and Drug Administration for precisely this
purpose.
Survey studies suggest that some people with HIV smoke marijuana to counteract
nausea caused by antiretroviral therapy. Researchers at the UC Center for
Medicinal Cannabis Research have tried to study the effect of smoked marijuana
on nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing chemotherapy but have struggled to
enroll enough subjects, Grant says.
Bruce Mirken, director of communications for the Marijuana Policy Project -- a
group that lobbies for the decriminalization of marijuana -- says he is all for
research on the chemical components in marijuana with the goal of making
more-purified and perhaps more-targeted drugs that do not deliver a
"high," but does not see "criminalizing use of that plant by
people who are ill when you are making its main psychoactive ingredient legal in
the form of a very expensive pill."
Tom Riley, a spokesman for the White House Office of National Drug Control
Policy, says marijuana advocates are seeking a free pass. "They want to be
exempted from the regular [drug] approval process," he says.
Con: Marijuana's damaging effects
Scientists say pot's health-related risks are
real but small in some instances.
Marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug in the country -- an
estimated 25 million Americans smoked it within the last year and close to 100
million have smoked it at least once in their life, according to the most recent
National Survey on Drug Use and Health by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration.
Rates and severity of marijuana addiction pale in comparison to that of legal
addictive drugs, alcohol and nicotine, according to the Advisory Council on the
Misuse of Drugs, a panel of independent experts advising the British government,
in a rare head-to-head, scientific comparison.
Yet, the fact is, recreational use can lead to addiction, and inhaling marijuana
smoke is unhealthful for the lungs. Some researchers argue that marijuana may
predispose heavy users to mental illnesses such as psychosis and depression.
How big are these risks and how should they be measured against health benefits?
"The FDA has ruled that marijuana has no medical benefits, but its harms
are well known and proven," says Tom Riley, a spokesman for the White House
Office of National Drug Control Policy, referring to an April 2006 statement
released by the FDA and several other federal agencies concluding that smoking
marijuana was not of medicinal use.
For comparison's sake, Riley cites the prescription drug Vioxx. The FDA, he
notes, pulled Vioxx off the market in spite of its proven efficacy, because it
created problems in a small number of people.
Then, too, the number of people adversely affected by marijuana use is large,
Riley says. "There are more teens in drug treatment for marijuana
dependence than for alcohol or any other drug," he says.
Marijuana is a Schedule 1 drug by the Drug Enforcement Administration's
Controlled Substances Act, a classification reserved for drugs carrying the
highest risk for addiction and no medical benefit.
Scientists have reviewed the weed's risks and find them to be real, but small.
Ten years ago, the Institute of Medicine reviewed the scientific evidence about
marijuana at the request of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. The 1999
report states that, "except for the harms associated with smoking, the
adverse effects of marijuana use are within the range of effects tolerated for
other medications."
In February, the American College of Physicians, the nation's second-largest
physicians group, released a position paper in support of medical-marijuana
research, protecting doctors from criminal prosecution and rescheduling
marijuana as a less harmful drug.
A British advisory group this year found no evidence to reclassify cannabis as a
more harmful drug in that country. In contrast to the U.S., the U.K. puts
cannabis in the lowest category (Class C) in terms of criminal penalties for
possession or sale, although government officials are campaigning to move it to
Class B.
To investigate the risks of marijuana, researchers typically use heavy marijuana
smokers as subjects. Though such a study design may be convenient, it makes
interpretation tricky because heavy users may have traits in common besides
smoking pot. Thus, says psychologist and marijuana researcher Stanley Zammit of
Cardiff University in Wales, it is not easy in these kinds of studies to
separate out the contribution of marijuana to any measurable effect in the
group.
Psychosis
Claims of a link between marijuana use and psychotic episodes came under
scrutiny after the U.K. downgraded cannabis from Class B to Class C in 2004. In
2007, Zammit was asked by England's Department of Health to survey the existing
evidence to determine the long-term risks for mental illness from using
cannabis. After researching the literature and including only those studies that
satisfied certain criteria, he combined the results in a 2007 Lancet paper.
He concluded that marijuana use was associated with an increased risk of
psychosis -- ranging from self-reported symptoms such as delusions or
hallucinations to clinically diagnosed schizophrenia.
The risk is small, he adds. Cannabis use was associated with a 40% increase in
risk overall and up to a twofold increase in heavy users. Because the risk of
any person developing psychosis in their lifetime is about 2% to 3%, cannabis
use at worst increases that to 5%. "So 95% of the people are not going to
get psychotic, even if they smoke on a daily basis," Zammit says.
Zammit adds that "the main limitations of these studies is that you can
never be sure that it's the cannabis itself that's causing this risk."
Heavy users of marijuana may differ from nonusers in other traits -- including
those that lead independently to increased drug use and risk of psychosis. The
studies he reviewed tried to take into account this possibility but could not
rule it out entirely.
The bottom line? "The evidence is probably strong enough that people should
be aware of this risk," he says.
Even if it's real, the risk of developing psychosis because of marijuana use is
smaller than with use of some other drugs -- including legal ones such as
cigarettes, says Mitch Earleywine, a psychologist at the State University of New
York University at Albany.
Grant says that numbers of schizophrenia cases have not increased since before
the 1960s, when widespread marijuana use began. "The data are variable to
be sure, but most studies have found that over the years the rate of
schizophrenia has been stable or even declining," he says.
Depression
In an American Journal of Psychiatry study, 1,920 adults were assessed for
marijuana use and depression and followed for 15 years. In those subjects who
had no depressive symptoms at the study's start, marijuana abusers were four
times more likely to develop depressive symptoms down the road. But Zammit, who
reviewed this paper and 23 others in his 2007 Lancet paper, says the data
overall are even murkier than for psychosis. Most of the studies he reviewed did
not assess symptoms of depression before marijuana use, and so didn't rule out
the idea that depression makes someone more likely to smoke marijuana -- and not
the other way around.
Thinking
A review of the scientific literature published in the Journal of the
International Neuropsychological Society in 2003 looked at whether marijuana
smoking had lasting effects on cognition after THC has left the body. Marijuana
use was found to have small effects on memory in long-term users -- measured by
asking subjects to recall words, for instance -- but no differences were seen on
attention, verbal skills and reaction time. "We were actually
surprised," says Grant, an author on the study. Even if the marijuana
itself wasn't causing such things, he expected marijuana users might have other
less-than-healthful behaviors -- they may drink a bit more, or use some other
drugs, and "you might expect them to do a little worse."
A 2002 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Assn. found that a
group of 51 heavy marijuana users (two joints per day) recalled two to three
fewer words on average than nonusers in a memory test with a list of 15 words.
A second study, published in the Archives of General Psychiatry in 2001, found a
similar deficit in 63 daily marijuana smokers who hadn't smoked for up to a
week. After 28 days of not smoking marijuana the effect disappeared.
Children
Studies on brain function and mental illness cited above were conducted in adult
marijuana users. How the drug affects adolescents is not completely resolved,
but the data are more troubling.
A 2000 paper in the Journal of Addictive Diseases recruited 58 marijuana users
and found structural changes in the brains of those who had starting smoking
marijuana before age 17 but not in those who didn't start smoking until they
were older.
"There's also a modest decrease in IQ if teens use heavily, though weekly
users and folks who quit don't seem to show it," Earleywine says.
Adolescence, he says, is a time when brain neurons are making oodles of new
connections, and it's possible that a psychoactive drug such as marijuana may
adversely influence that process.
Lungs
Before it has any effect on the brain, marijuana smoke enters the body through
the lungs. Dr. Donald Tashkin, professor of medicine at the UCLA David Geffen
School of Medicine, has studied the pulmonary consequences of marijuana use for
25 years, recruiting a group of 280 heavy habitual pot smokers in the early
1980s, including some who also smoked cigarettes. (Subjects averaged three
joints per day for an average of 15 years.) For comparison, he also recruited
cigarette smokers who didn't use marijuana and people who didn't smoke anything.
Tashkin has done a number of studies over the decades comparing these groups.
"I began with the hypothesis that regular smoking of marijuana would have
an impact on the lungs qualitatively similar to the impact of regular tobacco
smoking," he says. That's because the smoke of both plants are more similar
than different.
Tashkin and his colleagues did find symptoms of chronic bronchitis in his
marijuana-smoking group. In a 1987 study in the American Review of Respiratory
Diseases, they reported that incidence of chronic cough, sputum production and
wheezing was similar to that in cigarette smokers.
In a second study in the same subjects published in the American Journal of
Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine in 1998, examination of the airways and
the cells lining the airways found swelling, redness and increased secretions in
marijuana users. Biopsies showed "extensive, widespread damage to the
mucosa," Tashkin says, similar to what was seen in tobacco users.
"This is amazing, because the marijuana smokers average three joints a day,
but the tobacco controls smoked 22 cigarettes, suggesting that on a
cigarette-to-cigarette basis, marijuana may be more damaging."
But marijuana smokers differ from tobacco smokers in other, potentially more
important ways, Tashkin adds. They do not seem to develop more serious
consequences of cigarette smoking, namely chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) -- the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S., killing 130,000 people
each year -- or lung cancer, the most common cancer in Americans and responsible
for an additional 160,000 annual deaths, according to 2005 statistics from the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
To study lung cancer, Tashkin looked at more than 600 lung cancer patients and
more than 1,000 control patients matched for age, socioeconomic class, family
history and other alcohol and drug use (along with many other potential
influences).
The results, published in a 2006 paper in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and
Prevention, found a large number of regular marijuana smokers were present in
both groups, but statistically there were no more in the cancer group than
control group, suggesting no association between marijuana use and lung cancer.
Tobacco smokers, on the other hand, showed a dose-dependent increase in risk:
with a 30%, 800% and 2,100% increased risk of lung cancer in those who smoked
less than a pack, one to two packs or more than two packs per day, respectively.
Other studies have found increased cancer risk. A study of 79 lung cancer
patients and 300 controls published in the European Respiratory Journal this
year found a fivefold increased risk in the heaviest marijuana users (daily use
for 10 years) and no effect in less heavy users.
But Tashkin says this conflicting report was much smaller in scale, having fewer
than 20 subjects in the group of heaviest marijuana users. "My critique
would be: It's a small study. I think that their small sample size is
responsible for vastly inflated estimates," he says.